ideas have to bow down in front of evidence...really..what if the means to prove the evidence for the idea has not yet been developed...
each one of us is fallible...maybe not
Conditioned thought process versus unconditioned open minded thinking-Will they yield differing results ? I think so. example-the statement "I contain multitudes"-A conditioned mind will think I as a single biological unit which contains many say for e.g. many hairs. But an unconditioned mind can think otherwise. I could be an emergence of multitudes of cells.. so it depends on a top down approach, a bottom up approach-somewhere in-between, an overlap-but thinking has to be unconditioned to be original.
Comments
Post a Comment